REVIEWERS COMMENTS ON RESEARCH PAPERS



Reviewers Comments On Research Papers

How to Respond to Reviewer Comments WordPress.com. How to write a reviewer report 5 6 Online review system Reviewer report forms are provided in the Online Review System for APEX Letters, and Regular Papers, Rapid Communications, and Brief Notes in JJAP. A brief explanation of each section of the report form for JJAP Regular Papers is given below. Slightly more compact forms are provided for, paper? Please comment on the specific field (e.g., diabetes, neurology) and activity (e.g., Because the article discusses a method to perfect digital holographic image reconstruction, I expect it will draw interest from researchers who want to apply holography to their research (as opposed to researchers doing fundamental research in optics.

For Reviewers FACETS Journal

Comments Research Papers UNIGRAZ. detract from the overall presentation, then they might escalate to the 'major comments' section. It is acceptable to write these comments in list (or bullet) form. (6) Recommendations Some referees will shower papers with invective even when they like it. An editor may not recognize this, paper? Please comment on the specific field (e.g., diabetes, neurology) and activity (e.g., Because the article discusses a method to perfect digital holographic image reconstruction, I expect it will draw interest from researchers who want to apply holography to their research (as opposed to researchers doing fundamental research in optics.

Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author): The authors have used ps laser to make nanoparticles on silver surface so that different visible colors can be realized due to the light absorption of nanoparticles with different sizes on the surface. First, as the authors agreed the original idea of making such color pattern on metal Last week's post focused on WHY it's good to review papers. This week, the focus is on HOW to review a paper. By "paper" I mean a manuscript resulting from primary research, submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journal. The ideas and opinions here are drawn from my …

You can look around in your area of research and can select some researchers who have worked in a closer topic and you can refer them as the possible reviewers while submitting your paper to the paper? Please comment on the specific field (e.g., diabetes, neurology) and activity (e.g., Because the article discusses a method to perfect digital holographic image reconstruction, I expect it will draw interest from researchers who want to apply holography to their research (as opposed to researchers doing fundamental research in optics

Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts: The Strengths and Weaknesses in Medical Education Reports Georges Bordage, MD, PhD ABSTRACT Purpose. Scientific journals rely on peer review to maintain the high quality and standards of papers ac-cepted for publication. The purpose of this study was to explore the strengths and weaknesses of Very often reviewers tend to use intermediate scores, because they are not entirely confident on their judgment, and/or because they did not have time to read their papers thoroughly. This attitude causes really good papers not to stand out, and very bad papers not to be “caught”.

How to Respond to Reviewer Comments Reviewers put a lot of time and energy into reading, editing, and commenting on research papers. At the JSSJ, we are particularly fond of our reviewers, and we want to make sure the entire publishing process I would like to sharing your experiences and suggestions to deal with reviewers’ comments. I received a major revisions for my manuscript with reviewers’ comments. The reviewer 1# said: The part of abstract is not readable and lacks the conclusion and research significance. MATERIALS & METHODS is writing very simple, poor, while logic is

In addition, reviewers of MountainDevelopment papers are asked to assess the practical value of the insights presented, while reviewers of MountainAgenda papers comment on the relevance of the research or policy agenda. For Reviewers. At FACETS we believe that peer review is the backbone of open access publishing and as such we take our peer review policy very seriously. We also acknowledge and appreciate the work done by reviewers and their contribution to the success of the journal.

How to Respond to Reviewer Comments Reviewers put a lot of time and energy into reading, editing, and commenting on research papers. At the JSSJ, we are particularly fond of our reviewers, and we want to make sure the entire publishing process Reviewers Comments on Research Papers and Publisher Rejection In virtually all worthwhile endeavours there is significant risk. Sharing your scholarly writing is no exception, and this is the case whether you are submitting it to a journal or press for publication or passing it along to instructors or mentors for commentary and grading.

How research papers are written How to Respond to Reviewer Comments and Revise Your Research Paper. Last updated Jul 20, 2019 0. As a researcher’s success depends on his ability to publish his work in an international peer-reviewed journal. For most researchers, completing the daunting task of conducting the research and compiling the data into an articulate manuscript is a complicated Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts: The Strengths and Weaknesses in Medical Education Reports Georges Bordage, MD, PhD ABSTRACT Purpose. Scientific journals rely on peer review to maintain the high quality and standards of papers ac-cepted for publication. The purpose of this study was to explore the strengths and weaknesses of

Reporting research writing papers responding to. How to write a reviewer report 5 6 Online review system Reviewer report forms are provided in the Online Review System for APEX Letters, and Regular Papers, Rapid Communications, and Brief Notes in JJAP. A brief explanation of each section of the report form for JJAP Regular Papers is given below. Slightly more compact forms are provided for, Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '98), New York, NY, August 1998) that uses a window of temporal interval to generatesequential patterns of alarms, may be a good technique to experiment on. Yet another technique to characterize a “normal” alarm may be to simply record.

How to write a response to reviewer comments in case of

reviewers comments on research papers

How to answer reviewers for a journal paper revision. How to write a reviewer report 5 6 Online review system Reviewer report forms are provided in the Online Review System for APEX Letters, and Regular Papers, Rapid Communications, and Brief Notes in JJAP. A brief explanation of each section of the report form for JJAP Regular Papers is given below. Slightly more compact forms are provided for, General Comments on Writing Research Papers Based on grading a good number of seminar papers & M. A. theses over the last years, the following is a list of suggestions of which some may apply to you while others may not. But a review is always good, so as this is a prelude to the work you must do on your up-.

Reviewers Comments on Research Papers and Publisher Rejection

reviewers comments on research papers

How to write a response to reviewer comments in case of. Reviewer Comments for Manuscript acp-2010-884: New cloud chamber experiments on the heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of oxalic acid in the immersion mode. General Remarks: The above article presents and discusses ice nucleation behaviour of oxalic acid (OA) in ternary solutions of both OA/NaCl/H2O and OA/H2SO4/H2O. In addition experiments are Indeed, empirical evidence suggests that papers that have undergone multiple rounds of peer review fare better in terms of citation counts than papers that are quickly accepted . However, in practice, the review process can be emotionally charged as you grapple with comments that may seem to you to be ill-informed, biased, or otherwise problematic..

reviewers comments on research papers


How to Respond to Reviewer Comments Reviewers put a lot of time and energy into reading, editing, and commenting on research papers. At the JSSJ, we are particularly fond of our reviewers, and we want to make sure the entire publishing process For Reviewers. At FACETS we believe that peer review is the backbone of open access publishing and as such we take our peer review policy very seriously. We also acknowledge and appreciate the work done by reviewers and their contribution to the success of the journal.

Reviewer Comments for Manuscript acp-2010-884: New cloud chamber experiments on the heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of oxalic acid in the immersion mode. General Remarks: The above article presents and discusses ice nucleation behaviour of oxalic acid (OA) in ternary solutions of both OA/NaCl/H2O and OA/H2SO4/H2O. In addition experiments are Our reviewers put a tremendous amount of effort into evaluating Cell Press review and research papers, and we owe them our continued gratitude. And we are not the only ones who are grateful: our authors frequently express appreciation for the valuable advice reviewers' efforts add.

How to write a reviewer report 5 6 Online review system Reviewer report forms are provided in the Online Review System for APEX Letters, and Regular Papers, Rapid Communications, and Brief Notes in JJAP. A brief explanation of each section of the report form for JJAP Regular Papers is given below. Slightly more compact forms are provided for Peer review has a vital role to play in research and publishing and a key step in that process is the revision of your paper. However, knowing how to respond to reviewers' comments isn't always easy - get it right and you could see your paper published, get it wrong and it could mean rejection. So what can you do to increase your chances of

Last week's post focused on WHY it's good to review papers. This week, the focus is on HOW to review a paper. By "paper" I mean a manuscript resulting from primary research, submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journal. The ideas and opinions here are drawn from my … Ask a colleague to comment on your paper before sending it for publication. “English is not my Native Language” is not a valid justification for reviewer who cannot comprehend. Reviewers do not wish to review papers that are not readable. Badly written papers are often recommended as “REJECT” by the Reviewers

How research papers are written How to Respond to Reviewer Comments and Revise Your Research Paper. Last updated Jul 20, 2019 0. As a researcher’s success depends on his ability to publish his work in an international peer-reviewed journal. For most researchers, completing the daunting task of conducting the research and compiling the data into an articulate manuscript is a complicated In addition, reviewers of MountainDevelopment papers are asked to assess the practical value of the insights presented, while reviewers of MountainAgenda papers comment on the relevance of the research or policy agenda.

I have had manuscripts reviewed for publication in academic journals, and I have also served as a peer reviewer on papers that were under consideration for publication. The short answer is that it really depends on what you count as "wrong," wi... detract from the overall presentation, then they might escalate to the 'major comments' section. It is acceptable to write these comments in list (or bullet) form. (6) Recommendations Some referees will shower papers with invective even when they like it. An editor may not recognize this

reviewers comments on research papers

Within a short period of time after submission, the status message showed ‘accept pending minor revisions.’ The only comment I received was: "Please check your paper for English language editing, and ensure that you follow the Editorial Formatting Comments listed in this letter. Congratulations." My paper had been edited by Editage before submission and I plan to get it edited once again I have had manuscripts reviewed for publication in academic journals, and I have also served as a peer reviewer on papers that were under consideration for publication. The short answer is that it really depends on what you count as "wrong," wi...

Reviewer comments and how to respond International

reviewers comments on research papers

Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers PubMed Central (PMC). The past 5 days, I've been completely immersed into replying reviewers' comments to a paper which will be published as a special publication after a conference in October. Previously, I did receive some comments from reviewers for other conference papers, but the effort they required to …, Peer review has a vital role to play in research and publishing and a key step in that process is the revision of your paper. However, knowing how to respond to reviewers' comments isn't always easy - get it right and you could see your paper published, get it wrong and it could mean rejection. So what can you do to increase your chances of.

Comments Research Papers UNIGRAZ

How to be a great reviewer for a research paper. Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts: The Strengths and Weaknesses in Medical Education Reports Georges Bordage, MD, PhD ABSTRACT Purpose. Scientific journals rely on peer review to maintain the high quality and standards of papers ac-cepted for publication. The purpose of this study was to explore the strengths and weaknesses of, Reviewer: The English is not good enough for publication Author: Some of the reviewer’s comments were so badly written, how can he be a good judge of English! It’s true that many reviewers do not have English as their first language..

Within a short period of time after submission, the status message showed ‘accept pending minor revisions.’ The only comment I received was: "Please check your paper for English language editing, and ensure that you follow the Editorial Formatting Comments listed in this letter. Congratulations." My paper had been edited by Editage before submission and I plan to get it edited once again Our reviewers put a tremendous amount of effort into evaluating Cell Press review and research papers, and we owe them our continued gratitude. And we are not the only ones who are grateful: our authors frequently express appreciation for the valuable advice reviewers' efforts add.

Last week's post focused on WHY it's good to review papers. This week, the focus is on HOW to review a paper. By "paper" I mean a manuscript resulting from primary research, submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journal. The ideas and opinions here are drawn from my … In addition, reviewers of MountainDevelopment papers are asked to assess the practical value of the insights presented, while reviewers of MountainAgenda papers comment on the relevance of the research or policy agenda.

How to write a reviewer report 5 6 Online review system Reviewer report forms are provided in the Online Review System for APEX Letters, and Regular Papers, Rapid Communications, and Brief Notes in JJAP. A brief explanation of each section of the report form for JJAP Regular Papers is given below. Slightly more compact forms are provided for I would like to sharing your experiences and suggestions to deal with reviewers’ comments. I received a major revisions for my manuscript with reviewers’ comments. The reviewer 1# said: The part of abstract is not readable and lacks the conclusion and research significance. MATERIALS & METHODS is writing very simple, poor, while logic is

Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts: The Strengths and Weaknesses in Medical Education Reports Georges Bordage, MD, PhD ABSTRACT Purpose. Scientific journals rely on peer review to maintain the high quality and standards of papers ac-cepted for publication. The purpose of this study was to explore the strengths and weaknesses of I do this because editors might have a harder time landing reviewers for these papers too, and because people who aren't deeply connected into our research community also deserve quality feedback

I have had manuscripts reviewed for publication in academic journals, and I have also served as a peer reviewer on papers that were under consideration for publication. The short answer is that it really depends on what you count as "wrong," wi... A reviewer can make nasty comments for couple of reasons. Some of them are following: 1. Being a scholar doesn’t make anybody a civilised let alone a good person. Some reviewers are genuinely as****es. They take advantage of the blind review and i...

You can look around in your area of research and can select some researchers who have worked in a closer topic and you can refer them as the possible reviewers while submitting your paper to the 29/09/2006 · Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers is based upon our years of experience as reviewers and as managers of the review process. Suggestions also came from PLoS staff and Editors and our research groups, the latter being new and fresh to the process of reviewing.

Peer review has a vital role to play in research and publishing and a key step in that process is the revision of your paper. However, knowing how to respond to reviewers' comments isn't always easy - get it right and you could see your paper published, get it wrong and it could mean rejection. So what can you do to increase your chances of I would like to sharing your experiences and suggestions to deal with reviewers’ comments. I received a major revisions for my manuscript with reviewers’ comments. The reviewer 1# said: The part of abstract is not readable and lacks the conclusion and research significance. MATERIALS & METHODS is writing very simple, poor, while logic is

You can look around in your area of research and can select some researchers who have worked in a closer topic and you can refer them as the possible reviewers while submitting your paper to the How research papers are written How to Respond to Reviewer Comments and Revise Your Research Paper. Last updated Jul 20, 2019 0. As a researcher’s success depends on his ability to publish his work in an international peer-reviewed journal. For most researchers, completing the daunting task of conducting the research and compiling the data into an articulate manuscript is a complicated

Guidelines for Reviewers The Responsibility of the Peer Reviewer The peer reviewer is responsible for critically reading and evaluating a manuscript in their specialty field, and then providing respectful, constructive, and honest feedback to authors about their submission. Reasons Reviewers Reject and Accept Manuscripts: The Strengths and Weaknesses in Medical Education Reports Georges Bordage, MD, PhD ABSTRACT Purpose. Scientific journals rely on peer review to maintain the high quality and standards of papers ac-cepted for publication. The purpose of this study was to explore the strengths and weaknesses of

29/09/2006 · Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers is based upon our years of experience as reviewers and as managers of the review process. Suggestions also came from PLoS staff and Editors and our research groups, the latter being new and fresh to the process of reviewing. I do this because editors might have a harder time landing reviewers for these papers too, and because people who aren't deeply connected into our research community also deserve quality feedback

Reviewer guidelines Mountain Research and Development

reviewers comments on research papers

For Reviewers FACETS Journal. Reporting research: writing papers, responding to reviewers, and appealing 1. Reporting research: Writing papers, responding to reviewers, and appealing 5th Edinburgh Clinical Research Methodology Course February 2016 Dr Trish Groves Head of research, BMJ 2., Reviewers Comments on Research Papers and Publisher Rejection In virtually all worthwhile endeavours there is significant risk. Sharing your scholarly writing is no exception, and this is the case whether you are submitting it to a journal or press for publication or passing it along to instructors or mentors for commentary and grading..

PhD Talk Reviewers' comments

reviewers comments on research papers

For Reviewers FACETS Journal. Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '98), New York, NY, August 1998) that uses a window of temporal interval to generatesequential patterns of alarms, may be a good technique to experiment on. Yet another technique to characterize a “normal” alarm may be to simply record Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author): The authors have used ps laser to make nanoparticles on silver surface so that different visible colors can be realized due to the light absorption of nanoparticles with different sizes on the surface. First, as the authors agreed the original idea of making such color pattern on metal.

reviewers comments on research papers


Reviewer: The English is not good enough for publication Author: Some of the reviewer’s comments were so badly written, how can he be a good judge of English! It’s true that many reviewers do not have English as their first language. How to Respond to Reviewer Comments Reviewers put a lot of time and energy into reading, editing, and commenting on research papers. At the JSSJ, we are particularly fond of our reviewers, and we want to make sure the entire publishing process

For Reviewers. At FACETS we believe that peer review is the backbone of open access publishing and as such we take our peer review policy very seriously. We also acknowledge and appreciate the work done by reviewers and their contribution to the success of the journal. Reviewers' comments: Reviewer #1 (Remarks to the Author): The authors have used ps laser to make nanoparticles on silver surface so that different visible colors can be realized due to the light absorption of nanoparticles with different sizes on the surface. First, as the authors agreed the original idea of making such color pattern on metal

In addition, reviewers of MountainDevelopment papers are asked to assess the practical value of the insights presented, while reviewers of MountainAgenda papers comment on the relevance of the research or policy agenda. How to write a reviewer report 5 6 Online review system Reviewer report forms are provided in the Online Review System for APEX Letters, and Regular Papers, Rapid Communications, and Brief Notes in JJAP. A brief explanation of each section of the report form for JJAP Regular Papers is given below. Slightly more compact forms are provided for

I would like to sharing your experiences and suggestions to deal with reviewers’ comments. I received a major revisions for my manuscript with reviewers’ comments. The reviewer 1# said: The part of abstract is not readable and lacks the conclusion and research significance. MATERIALS & METHODS is writing very simple, poor, while logic is paper? Please comment on the specific field (e.g., diabetes, neurology) and activity (e.g., Because the article discusses a method to perfect digital holographic image reconstruction, I expect it will draw interest from researchers who want to apply holography to their research (as opposed to researchers doing fundamental research in optics

Last week's post focused on WHY it's good to review papers. This week, the focus is on HOW to review a paper. By "paper" I mean a manuscript resulting from primary research, submitted to peer-reviewed scientific journal. The ideas and opinions here are drawn from my … How to Respond to Reviewer Comments Reviewers put a lot of time and energy into reading, editing, and commenting on research papers. At the JSSJ, we are particularly fond of our reviewers, and we want to make sure the entire publishing process

General Comments on Writing Research Papers Based on grading a good number of seminar papers & M. A. theses over the last years, the following is a list of suggestions of which some may apply to you while others may not. But a review is always good, so as this is a prelude to the work you must do on your up- Reviewer: The English is not good enough for publication Author: Some of the reviewer’s comments were so badly written, how can he be a good judge of English! It’s true that many reviewers do not have English as their first language.

29/09/2006 · Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers is based upon our years of experience as reviewers and as managers of the review process. Suggestions also came from PLoS staff and Editors and our research groups, the latter being new and fresh to the process of reviewing. 29/09/2006 · Ten Simple Rules for Reviewers is based upon our years of experience as reviewers and as managers of the review process. Suggestions also came from PLoS staff and Editors and our research groups, the latter being new and fresh to the process of reviewing.

How research papers are written How to Respond to Reviewer Comments and Revise Your Research Paper. Last updated Jul 20, 2019 0. As a researcher’s success depends on his ability to publish his work in an international peer-reviewed journal. For most researchers, completing the daunting task of conducting the research and compiling the data into an articulate manuscript is a complicated Peer review has a vital role to play in research and publishing and a key step in that process is the revision of your paper. However, knowing how to respond to reviewers' comments isn't always easy - get it right and you could see your paper published, get it wrong and it could mean rejection. So what can you do to increase your chances of

Reviewer Comments for Manuscript acp-2010-884: New cloud chamber experiments on the heterogeneous ice nucleation ability of oxalic acid in the immersion mode. General Remarks: The above article presents and discusses ice nucleation behaviour of oxalic acid (OA) in ternary solutions of both OA/NaCl/H2O and OA/H2SO4/H2O. In addition experiments are Ask a colleague to comment on your paper before sending it for publication. “English is not my Native Language” is not a valid justification for reviewer who cannot comprehend. Reviewers do not wish to review papers that are not readable. Badly written papers are often recommended as “REJECT” by the Reviewers

In addition, reviewers of MountainDevelopment papers are asked to assess the practical value of the insights presented, while reviewers of MountainAgenda papers comment on the relevance of the research or policy agenda. I have had manuscripts reviewed for publication in academic journals, and I have also served as a peer reviewer on papers that were under consideration for publication. The short answer is that it really depends on what you count as "wrong," wi...

How to write a reviewer report 5 6 Online review system Reviewer report forms are provided in the Online Review System for APEX Letters, and Regular Papers, Rapid Communications, and Brief Notes in JJAP. A brief explanation of each section of the report form for JJAP Regular Papers is given below. Slightly more compact forms are provided for You can look around in your area of research and can select some researchers who have worked in a closer topic and you can refer them as the possible reviewers while submitting your paper to the

paper? Please comment on the specific field (e.g., diabetes, neurology) and activity (e.g., Because the article discusses a method to perfect digital holographic image reconstruction, I expect it will draw interest from researchers who want to apply holography to their research (as opposed to researchers doing fundamental research in optics The past 5 days, I've been completely immersed into replying reviewers' comments to a paper which will be published as a special publication after a conference in October. Previously, I did receive some comments from reviewers for other conference papers, but the effort they required to …

reviewers comments on research papers

Reviewers top priority is to help authors improve the quality of their papers. Therefore, we need not be enraged or downhearted when reviewers' comments on our papers seem harsh. detract from the overall presentation, then they might escalate to the 'major comments' section. It is acceptable to write these comments in list (or bullet) form. (6) Recommendations Some referees will shower papers with invective even when they like it. An editor may not recognize this